Cfr estimation method for multi-band ofdm-based uwb systems

ABSTRACT

A multi-stage CFR estimation method for multi-band OFDM-based UWB systems is provided. The method comprises obtaining a CFR estimation ĥ r   (1)  by performing LS estimation using a channel estimation sequence from a received OFDM UWB frame; obtaining a CFR estimation ĥ r   (2)  by applying a frequency-domain smoothing to the CFR estimation ĥ r   (1)  with a first smoothing factor; obtaining a frame header which contains OFDM symbols transmitted with frequency-domain spreading on each OFDM symbol, and detecting signal signs based on a combination of two spread signals of the same OFDM symbol in the frame header with a decision directed mode and the CFR estimation ĥ r   (2)  assisted; obtaining a CFR estimation ĥ r   (3)  by using the signs and a finite-alphabet feature of the detected transmitted signals; obtaining a CFR estimation ĥ r   (4)  by applying a frequency-domain smoothing to the CFR estimation ĥ r   (3)  with a second smoothing factor; and obtaining a CFR estimation ĥ r  by averaging the CFR estimations ĥ r   (2)  and ĥ r   (4) .

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a method for estimating channel frequency response (CFR) for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) communications, and more particularly to a CFR estimation method for multi-band OFDM-based ultra-wideband (UWB) systems.

2. Description of Related Art

OFDM-based UWB communication has attracted a lot of attention in recent years, as described in the following references: [1] “A. Batra, J. Balakrishnan, G. R. Aiello, J. R. Foerster, and A. Dabak, “Design of a multiband OFDM system for realistic UWB channel environments,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 2123-2138, September 2004.”; [2] “WiMedia MBOA, MultiBand OFDM Physical Layer Specification, ver. 1.1.5, Jul. 14, 2006.”; [3] “Y. Li, A. F. Molisch, and J. Zhang “Practical approaches to channel estimation and interference suppression for OFDM-Based UWB communications,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 2317-2320, September 2006.”. The large bandwidth occupancy of UWB (from 3.1 GHz to 10.6 GHz) and the high efficiency in spectrum utilization provided by OFDM make it possible for the OFDM-UWB technology to achieve very high channel capacity. The OFDM-UWB can provide low-cost and high-speed wireless connectivity among devices within a short range. The wireless universal serial bus (USB), for example, has adopted the OFDM-UWB radio layer with the data rate up to 480 Mbps.

The extremely wide-band processing has brought a lot of challenges to the OFDM-UWB system design, especially to the design of some crucial receiving modules such as time synchronization, frequency synchronization, as well as the channel frequency response (CFR) estimation. The OFDM-based UWB system, as specified by the Wimedia Alliance (shown in [2]), uses frame-based transmission. Usually, the UWB channel can be treated as invariant over the transmission period of one OFDM frame. The estimation of CFR thus can be done based on the dedicated channel estimation sequence included in the frame preamble. In this sense, many existing schemes including the least-square (LS), the maximum-likelihood (ML), and the minimum mean-squared error (MMSE) algorithms can be adopted for CFR estimation, as described in the following references: [4] “B. Muquet, M. de Courville, and P. Duhamel, “Subspace-based blind and semi-blind channel estimation for OFDM systems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Proc., vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1699-1712, July 2002.”; [5] “S. Zhou and G. B. Giannakis, “Finite-Alphabet based channel estimation for OFDM and related multicarrier systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 1402-1414, August 2001.”; [6] “M. Morelli and U. Mengali, “A comparison of pilot-aided channel estimation methods for OFDM systems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 3065-3073, December 2001.”; [7] “O. Edfors, M. Sandell, J. van de Beek, S. K. Wilson, and P. O. Börjesson, “OFDM channel estimation by singular value decomposition,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 931-939, July 1998.”; [8] “L. Deneire, P. Vandenameele, L. V. d. Perre, B. Gyselinckx, and M. Engels, “A low complexity ML channel estimator for OFDM,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 135-140, February 2003.”. LS is the simplest, but has the drawback of low noise reduction capability. In particular, as the OFDM-UWB is supposed to deliver good service even under very low signal-noise ratio (SNR) condition (≦0 dB, see [1]), simply applying the LS algorithm to the channel estimation sequence may not yield the CFR estimation with acceptable accuracy. Both ML and MMSE offer high estimation accuracy, but suffer from high computational complexity. The ML estimation introduced in [8], for example, either requires pre-storing a large matrix in memory or performing matrix inversion in real time. This, of course, is prohibitive for actual implementation of low-power and low-cost wireless USB devices.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An object of the present invention is to provide a CFR estimation method for the multi-band OFDM-based UWB system, which is the LS based, but can achieve the estimation accuracy comparable to that of the ML based solution while maintaining the order of computational complexity similar to that of the conventional LS based solution.

According to the above-mentioned object, a CFR estimation method for multi-band OFDM-based UWB systems is provided. The CFR estimation method comprises: obtaining a CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾ by performing least square estimation using a channel estimation sequence from a received OFDM UWB frame; obtaining a CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾ by applying a frequency-domain smoothing to the CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾ with a first smoothing factor; obtaining from the received OFDM UWB frame a frame header which contains OFDM symbols transmitted with frequency-domain spreading on each OFDM symbol, each OFDM symbol being divided into N transmitted signals for modulating the corresponding subcarriers; and then detecting signs of the transmitted signals based on a combination of two frequency-domain spread transmitted signals of the same OFDM symbol with a decision directed mode and the CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾ assisted; obtaining a CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾ by using the signs and a finite-alphabet feature of the detected transmitted signals; obtaining a CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽⁴⁾ by applying a frequency-domain smoothing to the CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾ with a second smoothing factor; and finally, obtaining a CFR estimation ĥ_(r) by averaging the CFR estimations ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾ and ĥ_(r) ⁽⁴⁾.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an OFDM-UWB frame structure.

FIG. 2 is a diagram showing one realization of time-frequency code (TFC=1) for the mth multiband OFDM symbol group.

FIG. 3 is a flow chart describing a method for estimating the channel frequency response for an OFDM-UWB system of one embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4 is a plot showing the NMSE performance of the channel frequency response (CFR) estimation using the method of the present invention in comparison to the conventional LS and ML based methods.

FIG. 5 is a plot showing the FER performance of the CFR estimation using the method of this invention in comparison to the conventional LS and ML based methods as well as a method with the assumption that the CFR is known.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail by way of example and with reference to the above-mentioned figures.

As shown in FIG. 1, each OFDM-UWB frame is composed of a preamble 1, a frame header 2 and a frame payload 3. As specified in [2], the preamble 1 consists of 30 OFDM symbols. The first 24 symbols of the preamble are referred to as packet/frame sync sequence and the last 6 symbols of the preamble are referred to as channel estimation sequence which is dedicated to channel estimation. The frame header 2 consists of 12 OFDM symbols which convey information about the configuration of the current frame. The frame payload 3 consists of M OFDM data symbols where M is a multiple of 6, i.e, M=6P. The duration of each OFDM symbol is 0.3125 μs. Thus, the durations of the preamble, frame header and frame payload are respectively 9.375 μs, 3.75 μs and M×0.3125 μs. Denote by

_(P1) ^(P2) the finite integer set {P₁, P₁+1, . . . , P₂}. For discussion convenience, in the sequel, the OFDM symbol is indexed with n, n ε

₀ ^(M−17), and n=0 indicates the first channel estimation OFDM symbol. The OFDM symbols are divided into groups, each of which consists of 6 consecutive OFDM symbols and is indexed with m, m ε

₀ ^(P+2), and m=0 indicates the group of 6 OFDM symbols for channel estimation.

The 6 OFDM symbols in a group may be transmitted in multiple bands. The center frequency for the transmission of each OFDM symbol is prescribed by a time-frequency code (TFC). FIG. 2 shows one realization of TFC (TFC=1), where the first OFDM symbol of the mth group is transmitted on sub-band #1 (3168-3696 MHz); the second OFDM symbol is transmitted on sub-band #2 (3696-4224 MHz); the third OFDM symbol is transmitted on sub-band #3 (4224-4752 MHz); the fourth OFDM symbol is transmitted on sub-band #1 and so on. Without loss of generality, TFC=1 is used in the following.

Each OFDM symbol employs N=128 subcarriers, which include Q=112 actual tones (carry useful information), Q₁=10 guard tones, and Q₂=6 virtual (null) tones. Of the Q actual tones, R=12 are assigned as pilot tones. We consider the generation of the nth OFDM symbol (n=6m+i, i ε

₀ ⁵, m ε

₀P+2), and let

s _(m) ^((i)) =[s _(m) ^((i))(0), s_(m) ^((i))(1), . . . , s _(m) ^((i))(N−1)]^(T)   (1)

be a vector of N transmitted signals, where (.)^(T) denotes transpose and s_(m) ^((i))(k), k ε

₀ ^(N−1), is the transmitted signal modulating the kth subcarrier. Define an R×1 vector, p=[p(0), p(1), . . . , p(R−1)]^(T)=[5, 15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 73, 83, 93, 103, 113 , 123]^(T). Let Q₀=(Q+Q₁)/2, s_(m) ^((i))(k) is drawn from the quadrature phase-shift keying (QPSK) constellation—denoted as ±c±jc with j=√{square root over (−1)} and c=√{square root over (2)}/2, if k ε

^(Q) ⁰ ∪

_(N−Q) ₀ ^(N−1), and, in particular, s_(m) ^((i))(k) is known at the receiver end (for the pilot tones) if k ε {p(l)}_(l=0) ^(R−1). Also, s_(m) ^((i))(k)=0, if (k=0) ∪ k ε

_(Q) ₀ ₁ ^(N−Q) ⁰ ⁻¹. The signal vector, s_(m) ^((i)), is fed to an N-point inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) processor that yields an N×1 time-domain vector (IDFT output), denoted by x_(m) ^((i)) (see x_(m) ⁰, x_(m) ⁽¹⁾, x_(m) ⁽²⁾, x_(m) ⁽³⁾, x_(m) ⁽⁴⁾, and, x_(m) ⁽⁵⁾ in FIG. 2). To eliminate the intersymbol interference (ISI) resulting from the time dispersive channels, an Ng-point zero-padded (ZP) suffix is appended to each time-domain vector x_(m) ^((i)), thus forming an OFDM symbol as shown in FIG. 2.

The UWB channel is modeled as an N_(h)-tap finite impulse response filter whose impulse response on the rth sub-band is denoted as

h _(r) ^((t)) =[h _(r) ^((t))(0), h _(r) ^((t))(1), . . . , h _(r) ^((t))(N_(h)−1)]^(T) , r ε

₁ ³   (2)

where the superscript ^((t)) indicates time-domain. The corresponding channel frequency response (CFR) h_(r)=[h_(r)(0), h_(r)(1), . . . , h_(r)(N−1)]^(T) is given by h_(r)=F_(N) _(h) h_(r) ^((t)), where F_(N), is the first N_(h) columns of the N-point DFT matrix.

For the sake of simplicity and without loss of validity, we assume perfect time and frequency synchronization in the following discussion. At the receiver end, the received samples pass through an N-point DFT processor after N_(g) zero padded points of each OFDM symbol are removed by using an overlap-and-add method. With the assumption that N_(h)≦N_(g), the output of the DFT processor corresponding to the nth received OFDM symbol, y_(m) ^((i))=[y_(m) ^((i))(0), y_(m) ^((i))(1), . . . , y_(m) ^((i))(N−1)]^(T), is given by

y _(m) ^((i))(k)=s _(m) ^((i))(k)h _(r)(k)+v _(r)(k)   (3)

r=|i|₃+1, i ε

₀ ⁵, and k ε

₀ ^(N−1), where |.|₃ stands for the modulo-3 operation, and v_(r)(k) is the channel noise on the ith sub-band, which is modeled in frequency-domain as a zero mean Gaussian process with variance σ_(r) ².

Moreover, it should be noted that, within each OFDM symbol contained in the frame header, a frequency-domain spreading is performed. That is,

s _(m) ^((i))(k)=(s _(m) ^((i))(N−k))* k ε

₁ ^(Q/2) , i ε

₀ ⁵ , m ε

₁ ²   (4)

where (•)* denotes conjugation. The frequency-domain spreading maximizes frequency-diversity by transmitting the same information (a complex number and its complex conjugate) on two separate subcarriers within the same OFDM symbol. The property has been used in the development of the channel estimation scheme of this invention as we shall see in the following description.

Referring to FIG. 3, one embodiment of the present invention consists of five steps. Let ĥ_(r) ^((q))=[ĥ_(r) ^((q))(0), ĥ_(r) ^((q))(1), . . . , ĥ_(r) ^((q))(N−1)]^(T), r ε

₁ ³, be the estimate of h_(r) after the qth step. In the first step, we obtain ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾ from (3) as

ĥ _(r) ⁽¹⁾(k)=[y ₀ ^((r−1))(k)/s ₀ ^((r−1))(k)+y ₀ ^((r+2))(k)/s ₀ ^((r+2))(k)]/2   (5)

k ε

^(Q/2) ∪

_(N−Q/2) ^(N−1). Clearly, this is the LS estimation using the dedicated channel estimation sequence (m=0), which is improved (with 3 dB gain in estimation accuracy) by averaging the two results obtained from the same sub-band.

In the second step, based on the assumption that the channel coherent bandwidth is much larger than the subcarrier spacing (which is valid under the UWB channel conditions), we apply a simple frequency-domain smoothing to such that ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾ with a first smoothing factor α is obtained as:

ĥ _(r) ⁽²⁾(k)=α[ĥ _(r) ⁽¹⁾(k−1)+ĥ _(r) ⁽¹⁾(k+1)]+(1−2α)ĥ _(r) ⁽¹⁾(k)   (6)

k ε

₁ ^(Q/2) ∪

_(N−Q/2) ^(N−1), where 0<α<0.5. In this way, the CFR on each subcarrier has been smoothed using the estimations on its adjacent subcarriers such that the residual error contained in the initial LS estimate can be reduced.

Next, in the third step, we introduce an efficient decision-directed (DD) detection based semi-blind CFR estimation by exploiting the frequency-domain spreading property of the frame header and the finite-alphabet feature of QPSK modulation. Denote by ŝ_(m) ^((i))(k), k ε

₁ ^(Q/2) ∪

_(N−Q/2) ^(N−1) and k ∉ {p(l)}_(l=0) ^(R−1), the detected transmitted signals of an OFDM symbol (after equalization using ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾), are obtained as

ŝ _(m) ^((i))(k)=y _(m) ^((i))(k)/ĥ _(r) ⁽²⁾(k), r=|i| ₃+1, i ε

₀ ⁵ , m ε

₁ ².   (7)

Correspondingly, let

u _(m) ^((i)) =[u _(m) ^((i))(0), u _(m) ^((i))(1), . . . , u _(m) ^((i))(N−1)]^(T)

and

v _(m) ^((i)) =[v _(m) ^((i))(0), v _(m) ^((i))(1), . . . , v _(m) ^((i))(N−1)]^(T)

which are calculated by

$\begin{matrix} {{u_{m}^{(i)}(k)} = \left\{ {\begin{matrix} {{{sgn}\left\lbrack {\left( {{\lambda_{m}^{(i)}(k)} + {\lambda_{m}^{(i)}\left( {N - k} \right)}} \right)} \right\rbrack},} & {k \in {{\mathbb{Z}}_{1}^{Q/2}\mspace{14mu} {and}\mspace{14mu} k} \notin \left\{ {p(l)} \right\}_{l = 0}^{R - 1}} \\ {{u_{m}^{(i)}\left( {N - l} \right)},} & {k \in {{\mathbb{Z}}_{N - {Q/2}}^{N - 1}\mspace{14mu} {and}\mspace{14mu} k} \notin \left\{ {p(l)} \right\}_{l = 0}^{R - 1}} \end{matrix}\mspace{14mu} {and}} \right.} & (8) \\ {{v_{m}^{(i)}(k)} = \left\{ \begin{matrix} {{{sgn}\left\lbrack {\left( {{\lambda_{m}^{(i)}(k)} - {\lambda_{m}^{(i)}\left( {N - k} \right)}} \right)} \right\rbrack},} & {k \in {{\mathbb{Z}}_{1}^{Q/2}\mspace{14mu} {and}\mspace{14mu} k} \notin \left\{ {p(l)} \right\}_{l = 0}^{R - 1}} \\ {{- {v_{m}^{(i)}\left( {N - k} \right)}},} & {k \in {{\mathbb{Z}}_{N - {Q/2}}^{N - 1}\mspace{14mu} {and}\mspace{14mu} k} \notin \left\{ {p(l)} \right\}_{l = 0}^{R - 1}} \end{matrix} \right.} & (9) \end{matrix}$

where

(x) and

(x) denote the real and imaginary parts of x, respectively, sgn(x) equals to 1, if x≧0, and, −1, otherwise, and

λ_(m) ^((i))(k)=|ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾(k)|² ŝ _(m) ^((i))(k)=y _(m) ^((i))(k)[ĥ _(r) ⁽²⁾(k)]*   (10)

k ε

₁ ^(Q/2) ∪

_(v−Q/2) ^(N−1) and k ∉ {p(l)}_(l=0) ^(R−1), i ε

_(o) ⁵, and m ε

₁ ². It should be noted that multiplying ŝ_(m) ^((i))(k) by |ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾(k)|² in (10) yields a weighted combining of the two frequency-domain spread signals in (8) and (9), i.e., λ_(m) ^((i))(k)+λ_(m) ^((i))N−k) and λ_(m) ^((i))(k)−λ_(m) ^((i))(N−k), in a way similar to the maximum ratio combining (MRC) (see, for example, [3]), but with lower complexity as no division is required as can be seem from (10). Furthermore, the use of signals' signs instead of their actual values in (8) and (9) makes the proposed CFR-aided DD coherent detection in this invention noise-resistant and thus reliable. Therefore, by using the finite-alphabet feature ({(+c,−c),(+c,+c),(−c,−c),(−c,+c)}) of QPSK modulation, and note that |s_(m) ^((i))(k)|²=2c²=1, the CFR estimation, ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾, in this step can be obtained as

$\begin{matrix} {{{\hat{h}}_{r}^{(3)}(k)} = {{\frac{c}{4}{\sum\limits_{m = 1}^{2}{\sum\limits_{{l = {r - 1}},{r + 2}}{\left( {{y_{m}^{(l)}(k)}\left\lbrack {{u_{m}^{(l)}(k)} - {j\; {v_{m}^{(l)}(k)}}} \right\rbrack} \right)k}}}} \in {{\mathbb{Z}}_{1}^{Q/2}\bigcup{{\mathbb{Z}}_{N - {Q/2}}^{N - 1}\mspace{14mu} {and}\mspace{14mu} k}} \notin {\left\{ {p(l)} \right\}_{l = 0}^{R - 1}.}}} & (11) \end{matrix}$

Taking the pilot tones into account, (11) can be further expressed as

$\begin{matrix} {{{\hat{h}}_{r}^{(3)}(k)} = \left\{ \begin{matrix} {{\frac{c}{4}{\sum\limits_{m = 1}^{2}{\underset{q = {r + 2}}{\sum\limits_{q = {r - 1}}}\left( {{y_{m}^{(q)}(k)}\left\lbrack {{u_{m}^{(q)}(k)} - {j\; {v_{m}^{(q)}(k)}}} \right\rbrack} \right)}}},} & \begin{matrix} {k \in {{\mathbb{Z}}_{1}^{Q/2}\bigcup{\mathbb{Z}}_{N - {Q/2}}^{N - 1}}} \\ {{{and}\mspace{20mu} k} \notin \left\{ {p(l)} \right\}_{l = 0}^{R - 1}} \end{matrix} \\ {{\frac{1}{4}{\sum\limits_{m = 1}^{2}{\underset{q = {r + 2}}{\sum\limits_{q = {r - 1}}}\left( {{y_{m}^{(q)}(k)}\left\lbrack {s_{m}^{(q)}(k)} \right\rbrack}^{*} \right)}}},} & \begin{matrix} {k \in \left\{ {p(l)} \right\}_{l = 0}^{R - 1}} \\ {r \in {{\mathbb{Z}}_{1}^{3}.}} \end{matrix} \end{matrix} \right.} & (12) \end{matrix}$

In the fourth step of the channel estimation, we apply a frequency-domain smoothing to ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾ obtained in the third step. The resulting CFR estimation, ĥ_(r) ⁽⁴⁾, is given by

$\begin{matrix} {{{{\hat{h}}_{r}^{4}(k)} = {{{{\alpha_{r}\left( {k - 1} \right)}{{\hat{h}}_{r}^{(3)}\left( {k - 1} \right)}} + {{\alpha_{r}\left( {k + 1} \right)}{{\hat{h}}_{r}^{(3)}\left( {k + 1} \right)}} + {\left( {1 - {\alpha_{r}\left( {k - 1} \right)} - {\alpha_{r}\left( {k + 1} \right)}} \right){{\hat{h}}_{r}^{(3)}(k)}k}} \in {{\mathbb{Z}}_{1}^{Q/2}\bigcup{\mathbb{Z}}_{N - {Q/2}}^{N - 1}}}},\mspace{14mu} {where}} & (13) \\ {{\alpha_{r}(k)} = {{\min\left( {\alpha,\frac{Q{{{\hat{h}}_{r}^{(1)}(k)}}^{2}}{\sum\limits_{l \in {{\mathbb{Z}}_{1}^{Q/2}\bigcup{\mathbb{Z}}_{N - {Q/2}}^{N - 1}}}{{{\hat{h}}_{r}^{(1)}(l)}}^{2}}} \right)}.}} & (14) \end{matrix}$

The use of CFR-related smoothing factors, α_(r)(k)'s, can further enhance the robustness of the proposed DD detection against different channel conditions. Finally, in the fifth step, we obtain ĥ_(r)=[ĥ_(r)(0), ĥ_(r)(1), . . . , ĥ_(r)(N−1)]^(T) by combining ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾ and ĥ_(r) ⁽⁴⁾ via averaging, i.e.,

ĥ _(r) =ĥ _(r) ⁽⁵⁾=(2ĥ _(r) ⁽²⁾+4ĥ _(r) ⁽⁴⁾)/6, r ε

₁ ³.   (15)

The multi-stage CFR estimation method of the present invention is still LS based, but enhanced with the frequency-domain smoothing as well as a unique and simple decision-directed coherent detection process. The present invention outperforms the existing solutions in the sense that it achieves the estimation accuracy comparable to that of the complicated ML solution while maintaining low computational complexity similar to the LS solution.

The channel estimation performance can be evaluated in terms of normalized mean-squared error (NMSE) defined by

${NMSE} = \frac{\sum\limits_{r = 1}^{3}{E\left\lbrack {\sum\limits_{k \in {{\mathbb{Z}}_{1}^{Q/2}\bigcup{\mathbb{Z}}_{N - {Q/2}}^{N - 1}}}{{{h_{r}(k)} - {{\hat{h}}_{r}(k)}}}^{2}} \right\rbrack}}{\sum\limits_{r = 1}^{3}{E\left\lbrack {\sum\limits_{k \in {{\mathbb{Z}}_{1}^{Q/2}\bigcup{\mathbb{Z}}_{N - {Q/2}}^{N - 1}}}{{h_{r}(k)}}^{2}} \right\rbrack}}$

where E[.] denotes the statistical average operation over the Monte Carlo tests. By averaging, the four extra estimations (per sub-band) obtained using the frame header shall introduce about 10 log₁₀ (6/2)=4.77 dB gain over the initial estimation using two dedicated channel estimation symbols (per sub-band). The frequency-domain smoothing further contributes about 2˜2.5 dB gain. Therefore, the present invention can achieve about 7 dB gain over the conventional LS solution in total, which even outperforms the complicated ML solution using two dedicated channel estimation symbols (per sub-band). This will be further demonstrated in the following numerical examples.

The effectiveness of the proposed CFR estimation method of this invention is verified by numerical simulations. In the simulations, the OFDM-UWB system with the data rate of 80 Mbps is considered. The selection of a low data rate as example here is for demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed techniques under low SNR conditions. The UWB channel model CM1, which is a line of sight (LOS) S-V multipath channel as described in [1], has been used. Also, TFC=1, α=0.3, and the frame payload is 1024 bytes long.

FIG. 4 shows the NMSE performance versus the SNR for different channel estimation schemes. As expected, the proposed channel estimation (the present invention) performs much better than the conventional LS technique with about 7 dB gain. For comparison, FIG. 4 also shows the performance of the ML solution which has achieved about 6 dB gain over the LS technique. In this case, we have set N_(h)=N/4=32 which is less than N_(g)=37. Thus, theoretically, 6 dB gain is close to the maximum gain that the ML estimation can achieve. Observe from FIG. 4 that our proposed scheme is better than the ML estimation when SNR is low, and both perform similarly when SNR increases to a higher level. The frame error rate (FER) performance is shown in FIG. 5. It can be seen that the proposed scheme performs much better than the LS method (about 1.7 dB). It slightly outperforms the ML estimation and performs comparable to that with perfect channel knowledge.

Various modifications to the embodiment of the present invention described above may be made. For example, other steps can be added or used as substitute for those above. Thus, although the invention has been described above using particular embodiments, many variations are possible within the scope of the claims, as will be clear to the skilled in the art, without departing from the scope of the invention. 

1. A channel frequency response (CFR) estimation method for multi-band orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM)-based ultra-wideband (UWB) systems to achieve a CFR estimation, ĥ_(r)=[ĥ_(r)(0),ĥ_(r)(1), . . . ,ĥ_(r)(N−1)]^(T), on an rth sub-band, N indicating the number of subcarriers employed by one OFDM symbol, the superscript T denoting transpose, comprising: obtaining a CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾=[ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾(0),ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾(1), . . . ,ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾(N−1)]^(T) by performing least square estimation using a channel estimation sequence in a received OFDM UWB frame; obtaining a CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾=[ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾(0),ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾(1), . . . ,ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾(N−1)]^(T) by applying a frequency-domain smoothing to the CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾ with a first smoothing factor; obtaining from the received OFDM UWB frame a frame header which contains a plurality of OFDM symbols transmitted with frequency-domain spreading on each OFDM symbol, each OFDM symbol being divided into N transmitted signals for modulating the corresponding subcarriers; and then detecting signs of the transmitted signals based on a combination of two frequency-domain spread transmitted signals of the same OFDM symbol with a decision directed mode and the CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾ assisted; obtaining a CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾=[ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾(0),ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾(1), . . . ,ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾(N−1)]^(T) by using the signs and a finite-alphabet feature of the detected transmitted signals; obtaining a CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽⁴⁾=[ĥ_(r) ⁽⁴⁾(0), ĥ_(r) ⁽⁴⁾(1), . . . , ĥ_(r) ⁽⁴⁾(N−1)]^(T) by applying the frequency-domain smoothing to the CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾ with a second smoothing factor; and obtaining the CFR estimation ĥ_(r) by averaging the CFR estimations ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾ and ĥ_(r) ⁽⁴⁾.
 2. The CFR estimation method according to claim 1, wherein during the step of obtaining a CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾ by performing LS estimation using a channel estimation sequence in a received OFDM UWB frame, the CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾ is implemented by averaging two LS estimation results obtained from an identical sub-band.
 3. The CFR estimation method according to claim 1, wherein during the step of obtaining a CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾ by applying a frequency-domain smoothing to the CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾ with a first smoothing factor, the CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾ on each subcarrier is smoothed by using the CFR estimations on its adjacent subcarriers.
 4. The CFR estimation method according to claim 3, wherein the CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾ on subcarrier ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾(k), is given by ĥ _(r) ⁽²⁾(k)=α[ĥ _(r) ⁽¹⁾(k−1)+ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾(k+1)]+(1−2α)ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾(k), k ε

^(Q/2) ∪

_(N−Q/2) ^(N−1), where α is the first smoothing factor satisfying the condition 0<α<0.5; Q is the number of the subcarriers for carrying useful information;

_(P) ₁ ^(P) ² denotes the finite integer set {P₁, P₁+1, . . . , P₂}, and ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾(k−1, ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾(k+1) respectively indicate the CFR estimations ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾ on the subcarriers k−1, k, and, k+1.
 5. The CFR estimation method according to claim 1, wherein during the step of obtaining from the received OFDM UWB frame a frame header which contains a plurality of OFDM symbols transmitted with frequency-domain spreading on each OFDM symbol, the frequency-domain spreading on each OFDM symbol is implemented by transmitting a pair of relatively conjugated transmitted signals on two separate subcarries within the same OFDM symbol.
 6. The CFR estimation method according to claim 1, wherein the step of detecting signs of the transmitted signals based on a combination of two spread transmitted signals of the same OFDM symbol with a decision directed mode and the CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾ assisted, comprises: dividing an output on the subcarrier k of a discrete Fourier transform (DFT) processor, y_(m) ^((i))(k), by the CFR estimations ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾ on the subcarrier k, ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾(k) to achieve the detected transmitted signal on the subcarrier k, ŝ_(m) ^((i))(k); dividing an output on the subcarrier N−k of the DFT processor, y_(m) ^((i))(N−k), by the CFR estimations ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾ on the subcarrier N−k, ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾(N−k) to achieve the detected transmitted signal on the subcarrier N−k, ŝ_(m) ^((i))(N−k); multiplying the detected transmitted signal on the subcarrier k, ŝ_(m) ^((i))(k), by the squared magnitude of the CFR estimations ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾ on the subcarrier k, ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾(k), to yield a weighted frequency-domain spread signal, λ_(m) ^((i))(k)=y_(m) ^((i))(k)[ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾(k)]*; multiplying the detected transmitted signal on the subcarrier N−k, ŝ_(m) ^((i))(N−k), by the squared magnitude of the CFR estimations ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾ on the subcarrier N−k, ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾(N−k), to yield a weighted frequency-domain spread signal, if λ_(m) ^((i))(N−k)=y_(m) ^((i))(N−k)[ĥ_(r) ²(N−k)]* ; and combining two weighted frequency-domain spread signals, λ_(m) ^((i))(k) and λ_(m) ^((i))(N−k) , to yield a pair of combinations of two frequency-domain spread signals, λ_(m) ^((i))(k)+λ_(m) ^((i))(N−k) and λ_(m) ^((i))(k)−λ_(m) ^((i))(N−k); where [.]* denotes conjugation; the received OFDM UWB frame is composed of a plurality of OFDM symbol groups, indexed with m, each of which has a certain number of OFDM symbols, indexed with i; and the superscript (i) and the subscript m in y_(m) ^((i))(k), ŝ_(m) ^((i))(k) and λ_(m) ^((i))(k) indicate that the step of detecting is performed by using the ith OFDM symbol in the mth OFDM symbol group.
 7. The CFR estimation method according to claim 6, wherein the signs of the detected signal include the signs of the real and imaginary parts of the detected signal, and using the pair of combinations of two frequency-domain spread signals, λ_(m) ^((i))(k)+λ_(m) ^((i))(N−k) and λ_(m) ^((i))(k)−λ_(m) ^((i))(N−k), the signs of the real and imaginary parts of the detected signal on the subcarrier k are given by: $\begin{matrix} {{u_{m}^{(i)}(k)} = \left\{ {\begin{matrix} {{{sgn}\left\lbrack {\left( {{\lambda_{m}^{(i)}(k)} + {\lambda_{m}^{(i)}\left( {N - k} \right)}} \right)} \right\rbrack},} & {k \in {{\mathbb{Z}}_{1}^{Q/2}\mspace{14mu} {and}\mspace{14mu} k} \notin \left\{ {p(l)} \right\}_{l = 0}^{R - 1}} \\ {{u_{m}^{(i)}\left( {N - l} \right)},} & {k \in {{\mathbb{Z}}_{N - {Q/2}}^{N - 1}\mspace{14mu} {and}\mspace{14mu} k} \notin \left\{ {p(l)} \right\}_{l = 0}^{R - 1}} \end{matrix}\mspace{14mu} {and}} \right.} \\ {{v_{m}^{(i)}(k)} = \left\{ \begin{matrix} {{{sgn}\left\lbrack {\left( {{\lambda_{m}^{(i)}(k)} - {\lambda_{m}^{(i)}\left( {N - k} \right)}} \right)} \right\rbrack},} & {k \in {{\mathbb{Z}}_{1}^{Q/2}\mspace{14mu} {and}\mspace{14mu} k} \notin \left\{ {p(l)} \right\}_{l = 0}^{R - 1}} \\ {{- {v_{m}^{(i)}\left( {N - k} \right)}},} & {k \in {{\mathbb{Z}}_{N - {Q/2}}^{N - 1}\mspace{14mu} {and}\mspace{14mu} k} \notin \left\{ {p(l)} \right\}_{l = 0}^{R - 1}} \end{matrix} \right.} \end{matrix}$ where

_(P) ₁ ^(P) ² denotes the finite integer set {P₁P₁+1, . . . , P₂{;

(x) and

(x) denote the real and imaginary parts of x, respectively; sgn(x) equals to 1, if x≧0, and, −1, otherwise; Q is the number of the subcarriers for carrying useful information; and {p(l)}_(l=0) ^(R−1) index the R subcarriers assigned as pilot tones in each OFDM symbol.
 8. The CFR estimation method according to claim 1, wherein during the step of obtaining a CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾ by using the signs and a finite-alphabet feature of the detected transmitted signals, the CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾ on subcarrier k, ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾(k), with the finite-alphabet feature being {(+c,−c),(+c,+c),(−c,−c),(−c,+c)}, is obtained as: ${{\hat{h}}_{r}^{(3)}(k)} = \left\{ \begin{matrix} {{\frac{c}{4}{\sum\limits_{m = 1}^{2}{\underset{q = {r + 2}}{\sum\limits_{q = {r - 1}}}\left( {{y_{m}^{(q)}(k)}\left\lbrack {{u_{m}^{(q)}(k)} - {\left( {jv} \right)_{m}^{(q)}(k)}} \right\rbrack} \right)}}},} & \begin{matrix} {k \in {{\mathbb{Z}}_{1}^{Q/2}\bigcup{\mathbb{Z}}_{N - {Q/2}}^{N - 1}}} \\ {{{and}{\mspace{14mu} \;}k} \notin \left\{ {p(l)} \right\}_{l = 0}^{R - 1}} \end{matrix} \\ {{\frac{1}{4}{\sum\limits_{m = 1}^{2}{\underset{q = {r + 2}}{\sum\limits_{q = {r - 1}}}\left( {{y_{m}^{(q)}(k)}\left\lbrack {s_{m}^{(q)}(k)} \right\rbrack}^{*} \right)}}},} & {k \in \left\{ {p(l)} \right\}_{l = 0}^{R - 1}} \end{matrix} \right.$ where y_(m) ^((q))(k) is an output on the subcarrier k of a DFT processor; s_(m) ^((q))(k) is an input of an inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) processor; [.]* denotes conjugation; u_(m) ^((q))(k) and v_(m) ^((q))(k) respectively indicate the signs of the real and imaginary parts of the detected transmitted signal on the subcarrier k; j=√{square root over (−1)}; the received OFDM UWB frame is composed of a plurality of OFDM symbol groups, indexed with m, each of which has a certain number of OFDM symbols, indexed with q; and the superscript (q) and the subscript m indicate that the step of obtaining the CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾ is performed by using the qth OFDM symbol in the mth OFDM symbol group;

_(P) ₁ ^(P) ² denotes the finite integer set {P₁, P₁+1, . . . , P₂}; and Q is the number of the subcarriers for carrying useful information; and {p(l)}_(l=0) ^(R−1) index the R subcarriers assigned as pilot tones in each OFDM symbol.
 9. The CFR estimation method according to claim 1, wherein the second smoothing factor on subcarrier k is obtained as: ${{\alpha_{r}(k)} - {\min\left( {\alpha,\frac{Q{{{\hat{h}}_{r}^{(1)}(k)}}^{2}}{\sum\limits_{l \in {{\mathbb{Z}}_{1}^{Q/2}\bigcup{\mathbb{Z}}_{N - {Q/2}}^{N - 1}}}{{{\hat{h}}_{r}^{(1)}(l)}}^{2}}} \right)}},\mspace{14mu} {k \in {{\mathbb{Z}}_{1}^{Q/2}\bigcup{\mathbb{Z}}_{N - {Q/2}}^{N - 1}}}$ where min(x₁, x₂) means selecting a smaller one between two values, x₁ and x₂; α indicates the first smoothing factor; ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾(k) is the CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾ on the subcarrier k; ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾(l) is the CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽¹⁾ on the subcarrier l;

_(P) ₁ ^(P) ² denotes the finite integer set {P₁, P₁+1, . . . , P₂}; and Q is the number of the subcarriers for carrying useful information.
 10. The CFR estimation method according to claim 1, wherein the CFR estimation ĥ_(r) ⁽⁴⁾ on subcarrier k, ĥ_(r) ⁴(k), is obtained as: ĥ_(r) ⁴(k)=α_(r)(k−1)ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾(k−1)+α_(r)(k+1)ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾(k+1)+(1−α_(r)(k−1)−α_(r)(k+1)ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾(k) k ε

^(Q/2) ∪

_(N−Q/2) ^(N−1), where ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾(k−1), ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾(k), and ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾(k+1) indicate the CFR estimations ĥ_(r) ⁽³⁾ on subcarriers k−1, k, and k+1, respectively; α_(r)(k−1), and α_(r)(k+1) are the second smoothing factors corresponding to subcarriers k−1, and, k+1, respectively;

_(P) ₁ ^(P) ² denotes the finite integer set {P₁, P₁+1, . . . , P₂}; and Q is the number of the subcarriers for carrying useful information.
 11. The CFR estimation method according to claim 1, wherein during the step of obtaining a CFR estimation ĥ_(r) by averaging the CFR estimations ĥ_(r) ⁽²⁾ and ĥ_(r) ⁽⁴⁾, the CFR estimation ĥ_(r) is implemented as: ĥ _(r)=(2ĥ _(r) ⁽²⁾+4ĥ _(r) ⁽⁴⁾)/6. 